<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expensive Bass Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebassgeek.net/2008/07/31/expensive-bass-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/07/31/expensive-bass-porn/</link>
	<description>Words on music, circuitry, and the Square</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bass News &#187; Ritter Flora Aurum - $250000</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/07/31/expensive-bass-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Bass News &#187; Ritter Flora Aurum - $250000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/?p=363#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>[...] The Bass Geek   Weitersagen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Bass Geek   Weitersagen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Martin</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/07/31/expensive-bass-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/?p=363#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re considering buying this, you have too much money.

Just because you can, dosen&#039;t mean you should.

I love my $400 Fender Std. Mex. bass, and Danelectros are pretty groovy too.

However, Yea mammoth cloning. 
Two votes for that. One for me and one for Evan (my 4 year old) Mammoths ROCK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re considering buying this, you have too much money.</p>
<p>Just because you can, dosen&#8217;t mean you should.</p>
<p>I love my $400 Fender Std. Mex. bass, and Danelectros are pretty groovy too.</p>
<p>However, Yea mammoth cloning.<br />
Two votes for that. One for me and one for Evan (my 4 year old) Mammoths ROCK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/07/31/expensive-bass-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/?p=363#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if such a bass is supposed to rawk.  Rawk, to me, implies a southern boogie sort of rock, which would be most inappropriate.  Tobacco juice ruins the finish.  I think this is more likely to burble forth smooth jazz or fuzak, honestly.  Really expensive smooth jazz or fuzak.

I&#039;m all for the mammoth cloning, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if such a bass is supposed to rawk.  Rawk, to me, implies a southern boogie sort of rock, which would be most inappropriate.  Tobacco juice ruins the finish.  I think this is more likely to burble forth smooth jazz or fuzak, honestly.  Really expensive smooth jazz or fuzak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for the mammoth cloning, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Elias Avarice</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/07/31/expensive-bass-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Elias Avarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/?p=363#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>Yes, yes, very pretty.  But does is RAWK?

At least it has multiple uses.  In a decade or so, you can take a scraping from the nut and clone yerself a mammoth.  

Heh... I said &quot;scraping from the nut.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, very pretty.  But does is RAWK?</p>
<p>At least it has multiple uses.  In a decade or so, you can take a scraping from the nut and clone yerself a mammoth.  </p>
<p>Heh&#8230; I said &#8220;scraping from the nut.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

