<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, hell . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebassgeek.net/2008/05/28/well-hell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/05/28/well-hell/</link>
	<description>Words on music, circuitry, and the Square</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/05/28/well-hell/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/?p=277#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Still digging into it - it's different from those albums (more straight-ahead and loud, maybe a little more world-weary), but this band has done little wrong by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still digging into it - it&#8217;s different from those albums (more straight-ahead and loud, maybe a little more world-weary), but this band has done little wrong by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/05/28/well-hell/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/?p=277#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Is the new King's X any good? I really enjoyed Gretchen Goes to Nebraska, Faith Hope Love and King's X, but I lost track of them after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the new King&#8217;s X any good? I really enjoyed Gretchen Goes to Nebraska, Faith Hope Love and King&#8217;s X, but I lost track of them after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
