<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Qtrax the Real Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/</link>
	<description>Words on music, circuitry, and the Square</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Follow-up on Sharehead &#124; The Bass Geek</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow-up on Sharehead &#124; The Bass Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>[...] with major labels to create a free-to-consumers music distribution service. As we learned with Qtrax, these things need to have all the correct signatures in place, with whatever fluids involved dried [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with major labels to create a free-to-consumers music distribution service. As we learned with Qtrax, these things need to have all the correct signatures in place, with whatever fluids involved dried [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>The choice of Playsforsure is a killer, since MS doesn't even support it on their own new hardware.

I agree with you - this thing is going to implode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The choice of Playsforsure is a killer, since MS doesn&#8217;t even support it on their own new hardware.</p>
<p>I agree with you - this thing is going to implode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Wrong</title>
		<link>http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebassgeek.net/2008/01/28/is-qtrax-the-real-deal/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>My RSS reader has been on fire with Qtrax stuff this morning. To summarize what I read: this thing uses Gnutella networks and is either sharing their own stuff or is tracking and adding DRM to files already out there. The DRM seems to be (by all guesses) Windows Playsforsure which means it won't work with iPods or Zunes. The alleged iPod compatibility seems to be a reversed engineered FairPlay, which I'm sure Steve Jobs will love. Oh, and they jumped the gun on claiming the major label support. 

With each new story I read, this seems less and less likely to succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My RSS reader has been on fire with Qtrax stuff this morning. To summarize what I read: this thing uses Gnutella networks and is either sharing their own stuff or is tracking and adding DRM to files already out there. The DRM seems to be (by all guesses) Windows Playsforsure which means it won&#8217;t work with iPods or Zunes. The alleged iPod compatibility seems to be a reversed engineered FairPlay, which I&#8217;m sure Steve Jobs will love. Oh, and they jumped the gun on claiming the major label support. </p>
<p>With each new story I read, this seems less and less likely to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
